Defying the Dragon: Hong Kong and the World's Largest Dictatorship by Stephen Vines

Author:Stephen Vines [Vines, Stephen]
Language: eng
Format: epub
Tags: history, Asia, General, political science, Political Ideologies, democracy, Political Process, Political Advocacy
ISBN: 9781787384552
Google: p3U-EAAAQBAJ
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Published: 2021-03-25T23:28:30.083467+00:00

PART THREE

THE UNEXPECTED AND THE FUTURE

9

VIRUS AND CRISIS

At the beginning of 2020, protests in Hong Kong were ongoing, just with less ferocity—but they were soon overshadowed by another development which spread rapidly far beyond the SAR: the outbreak of Covid-19 in the central Mainland city of Wuhan. The uprising and the virus were coincidental, but linked by the blow they have delivered to the Chinese regime. Had Beijing “simply” been coping with international fallout from the crackdown in Hong Kong, the diplomatic nightmare on its hands would have been quite serious enough; but the fallout from the pandemic turned the nightmare into a full-scale crisis of credibility. At home, the crisis had the effect of sowing doubt over the invincibility of the regime, as citizens slowly became aware that the pandemic was being covered up, and then started suffering from its dire economic impact.

What the virus exposed, or maybe confirmed, was that China could not be trusted or relied upon when it came to confronting crucial events that brought the interests of the ruling party into conflict with other, public interests. As we saw in Chapter 3, it is precisely this logic that always places Party before profits. And to preserve the interests of the rulers the instinctive response of all authoritarian systems is to cover up bad news, as anything other than good news detracts from their preferred image of success. This is why China lost valuable time curbing the coronavirus and compounded the tardiness of its response by focusing on suppressing news of the outbreak, in preference to getting it under control.

In a series of social media posts, now deleted, Xin Meng—a researcher at China’s National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention—wrote that, when fighting a virus, “Politics comes first, security the second, science the third”.1 This means that, even when a deadly public health threat emerges and there is a compelling need for those in charge to be notified, the risks of delivering bad news tend to outweigh the benefits of behaving responsibly. The reality of how the system works is known throughout China. Wei Peng, a doctor at a fever clinic in a Wuhan community hospital at the epicentre of the outbreak, explained why, despite knowing about the new virus, he had not dreamt of bringing it to the attention of his superiors: “There is no gain for you if you report. No one would blame you if you didn’t.” On the other hand, the process of reporting things that the authorities do not want to hear only invites “tedious trouble”.2

When the news eventually got out, however, there was no place to hide. The leadership in Beijing then came up with the proposition that its way of handling the pandemic was infinitely superior to the response of elected governments overseas, because only authoritarian governments have what it takes to deal with emergencies on this scale. In September 2020, President Xi put it this way: “The major strategic achievement gained from China’s fight against COVID-19 fully

Download

Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.